Methods and problems of wavelength-routing in all-optical networks

We give a survey of recent theoretical results obtained for wavelength-routing in all-optical networks. The survey is based on the previous survey in [Beauquier, B., Bermond, J-C., Gargano, L., Hell, P., Perennes, S., Vaccaro, U.: Graph problems arising from wavelength-routing in all-optical networks. In: Proc. of the 2nd Workshop on Optics and Computer Science, part of IPPS'97, 1997]. We focus our survey on the current research directions and on the used methods. We also state several open problems connected with this line of research, and give an overview of several related research directions

Parameterized and approximation complexity of the detection pair problem in graphs

We study the complexity of the problem DETECTION PAIR. A detection pair of a graph $G$ is a pair $(W,L)$ of sets of detectors with $W\subseteq V(G)$, the watchers, and $L\subseteq V(G)$, the listeners, such that for every pair $u,v$ of vertices that are not dominated by a watcher of $W$, there is a listener of $L$ whose distances to $u$ and to $v$ are different. The goal is to minimize $|W|+|L|$. This problem generalizes the two classic problems DOMINATING SET and METRIC DIMENSION, that correspond to the restrictions $L=\emptyset$ and $W=\emptyset$, respectively. DETECTION PAIR was recently introduced by Finbow, Hartnell and Young [A. S. Finbow, B. L. Hartnell and J. R. Young. The complexity of monitoring a network with both watchers and listeners. Manuscript, 2015], who proved it to be NP-complete on trees, a surprising result given that both DOMINATING SET and METRIC DIMENSION are known to be linear-time solvable on trees. It follows from an existing reduction by Hartung and Nichterlein for METRIC DIMENSION that even on bipartite subcubic graphs of arbitrarily large girth, DETECTION PAIR is NP-hard to approximate within a sub-logarithmic factor and W[2]-hard (when parameterized by solution size). We show, using a reduction to SET COVER, that DETECTION PAIR is approximable within a factor logarithmic in the number of vertices of the input graph. Our two main results are a linear-time $2$-approximation algorithm and an FPT algorithm for DETECTION PAIR on trees.Comment: 13 page

Centroidal bases in graphs

We introduce the notion of a centroidal locating set of a graph $G$, that is, a set $L$ of vertices such that all vertices in $G$ are uniquely determined by their relative distances to the vertices of $L$. A centroidal locating set of $G$ of minimum size is called a centroidal basis, and its size is the centroidal dimension $CD(G)$. This notion, which is related to previous concepts, gives a new way of identifying the vertices of a graph. The centroidal dimension of a graph $G$ is lower- and upper-bounded by the metric dimension and twice the location-domination number of $G$, respectively. The latter two parameters are standard and well-studied notions in the field of graph identification. We show that for any graph $G$ with $n$ vertices and maximum degree at least~2, $(1+o(1))\frac{\ln n}{\ln\ln n}\leq CD(G) \leq n-1$. We discuss the tightness of these bounds and in particular, we characterize the set of graphs reaching the upper bound. We then show that for graphs in which every pair of vertices is connected via a bounded number of paths, $CD(G)=\Omega\left(\sqrt{|E(G)|}\right)$, the bound being tight for paths and cycles. We finally investigate the computational complexity of determining $CD(G)$ for an input graph $G$, showing that the problem is hard and cannot even be approximated efficiently up to a factor of $o(\log n)$. We also give an $O\left(\sqrt{n\ln n}\right)$-approximation algorithm

Improved Analysis of Deterministic Load-Balancing Schemes

We consider the problem of deterministic load balancing of tokens in the discrete model. A set of $n$ processors is connected into a $d$-regular undirected network. In every time step, each processor exchanges some of its tokens with each of its neighbors in the network. The goal is to minimize the discrepancy between the number of tokens on the most-loaded and the least-loaded processor as quickly as possible. Rabani et al. (1998) present a general technique for the analysis of a wide class of discrete load balancing algorithms. Their approach is to characterize the deviation between the actual loads of a discrete balancing algorithm with the distribution generated by a related Markov chain. The Markov chain can also be regarded as the underlying model of a continuous diffusion algorithm. Rabani et al. showed that after time $T = O(\log (Kn)/\mu)$, any algorithm of their class achieves a discrepancy of $O(d\log n/\mu)$, where $\mu$ is the spectral gap of the transition matrix of the graph, and $K$ is the initial load discrepancy in the system. In this work we identify some natural additional conditions on deterministic balancing algorithms, resulting in a class of algorithms reaching a smaller discrepancy. This class contains well-known algorithms, eg., the Rotor-Router. Specifically, we introduce the notion of cumulatively fair load-balancing algorithms where in any interval of consecutive time steps, the total number of tokens sent out over an edge by a node is the same (up to constants) for all adjacent edges. We prove that algorithms which are cumulatively fair and where every node retains a sufficient part of its load in each step, achieve a discrepancy of $O(\min\{d\sqrt{\log n/\mu},d\sqrt{n}\})$ in time $O(T)$. We also show that in general neither of these assumptions may be omitted without increasing discrepancy. We then show by a combinatorial potential reduction argument that any cumulatively fair scheme satisfying some additional assumptions achieves a discrepancy of $O(d)$ almost as quickly as the continuous diffusion process. This positive result applies to some of the simplest and most natural discrete load balancing schemes.Comment: minor corrections; updated literature overvie

From Balls and Bins to Points and Vertices

Given a graph G = (V, E) with |V| = n, we consider the following problem. Place m = n points on the vertices of G independently and uniformly at random. Once the points are placed, relocate them using a bijection from the points to the vertices that minimizes the maximum distance between the random place of the points and their target vertices. We look for an upper bound on this maximum relocation distance that holds with high probability (over the initial placements of the points). For general graphs and in the case m ≤ n, we prove the #P -hardness of the problem and that the maximum relocation distance is O(√n) with high probability. We present a Fully Polynomial Randomized Approximation Scheme when the input graph admits a polynomial-size family of witness cuts while for trees we provide a 2-approximation algorithm. Many applications concern the variation in which m = (1 − ǫ)n for some 0 < ǫ < 1. We provide several bounds for the maximum relocation distance according to different graph topologies

On the distance-edge-monitoring numbers of graphs

Foucaud et al. [Discrete Appl. Math. 319 (2022), 424-438] recently introduced and initiated the study of a new graph-theoretic concept in the area of network monitoring. For a set $M$ of vertices and an edge $e$ of a graph $G$, let $P(M, e)$ be the set of pairs $(x, y)$ with a vertex $x$ of $M$ and a vertex $y$ of $V(G)$ such that $d_G(x, y)\neq d_{G-e}(x, y)$. For a vertex $x$, let $EM(x)$ be the set of edges $e$ such that there exists a vertex $v$ in $G$ with $(x, v) \in P(\{x\}, e)$. A set $M$ of vertices of a graph $G$ is distance-edge-monitoring set if every edge $e$ of $G$ is monitored by some vertex of $M$, that is, the set $P(M, e)$ is nonempty. The distance-edge-monitoring number of a graph $G$, denoted by $dem(G)$, is defined as the smallest size of distance-edge-monitoring sets of $G$. The vertices of $M$ represent distance probes in a network modeled by $G$; when the edge $e$ fails, the distance from $x$ to $y$ increases, and thus we are able to detect the failure. It turns out that not only we can detect it, but we can even correctly locate the failing edge. In this paper, we continue the study of \emph{distance-edge-monitoring sets}. In particular, we give upper and lower bounds of $P(M,e)$, $EM(x)$, $dem(G)$, respectively, and extremal graphs attaining the bounds are characterized. We also characterize the graphs with $dem(G)=3$

Constructing Incremental Sequences in Graphs

Given a weighted graph , we investigate the problem of constructing a sequence of subsets of vertices (called groups) with small diameters, where the diameter of a group is calculated using distances in G. The constraint on these n groups is that they must be incremental: . The cost of a sequence is the maximum ratio between the diameter of each group Mi and the diameter of a group with I vertices and minimum diameter: . This quantity captures the impact of the incremental constraint on the diameters of the groups in a sequence. We give general bounds on the value of this ratio and we prove that the problem of constructing an optimal incremental sequence cannot be solved approximately in polynomial time with an approximation ratio less than 2 unless P = NP. Finally, we give a 4-approximation algorithm and we show that the analysis of our algorithm is tight

Monitoring the edges of product networks using distances

Foucaud {\it et al.} recently introduced and initiated the study of a new graph-theoretic concept in the area of network monitoring. Let $G$ be a graph with vertex set $V(G)$, $M$ a subset of $V(G)$, and $e$ be an edge in $E(G)$, and let $P(M, e)$ be the set of pairs $(x,y)$ such that $d_G(x, y)\neq d_{G-e}(x, y)$ where $x\in M$ and $y\in V(G)$. $M$ is called a \emph{distance-edge-monitoring set} if every edge $e$ of $G$ is monitored by some vertex of $M$, that is, the set $P(M, e)$ is nonempty. The {\em distance-edge-monitoring number} of $G$, denoted by $\operatorname{dem}(G)$, is defined as the smallest size of distance-edge-monitoring sets of $G$. For two graphs $G,H$ of order $m,n$, respectively, in this paper we prove that $\max\{m\operatorname{dem}(H),n\operatorname{dem}(G)\} \leq\operatorname{dem}(G\,\Box \,H) \leq m\operatorname{dem}(H)+n\operatorname{dem}(G) -\operatorname{dem}(G)\operatorname{dem}(H)$, where $\Box$ is the Cartesian product operation. Moreover, we characterize the graphs attaining the upper and lower bounds and show their applications on some known networks. We also obtain the distance-edge-monitoring numbers of join, corona, cluster, and some specific networks.Comment: 19 page

Constructing disjoint Steiner trees in Sierpi\'{n}ski graphs

Let $G$ be a graph and $S\subseteq V(G)$ with $|S|\geq 2$. Then the trees $T_1, T_2, \cdots, T_\ell$ in $G$ are \emph{internally disjoint Steiner trees} connecting $S$ (or $S$-Steiner trees) if $E(T_i) \cap E(T_j )=\emptyset$ and $V(T_i)\cap V(T_j)=S$ for every pair of distinct integers $i,j$, $1 \leq i, j \leq \ell$. Similarly, if we only have the condition $E(T_i) \cap E(T_j )=\emptyset$ but without the condition $V(T_i)\cap V(T_j)=S$, then they are \emph{edge-disjoint Steiner trees}. The \emph{generalized $k$-connectivity}, denoted by $\kappa_k(G)$, of a graph $G$, is defined as $\kappa_k(G)=\min\{\kappa_G(S)|S \subseteq V(G) \ \textrm{and} \ |S|=k \}$, where $\kappa_G(S)$ is the maximum number of internally disjoint $S$-Steiner trees. The \emph{generalized local edge-connectivity} $\lambda_{G}(S)$ is the maximum number of edge-disjoint Steiner trees connecting $S$ in $G$. The {\it generalized $k$-edge-connectivity} $\lambda_k(G)$ of $G$ is defined as $\lambda_k(G)=\min\{\lambda_{G}(S)\,|\,S\subseteq V(G) \ and \ |S|=k\}$. These measures are generalizations of the concepts of connectivity and edge-connectivity, and they and can be used as measures of vulnerability of networks. It is, in general, difficult to compute these generalized connectivities. However, there are precise results for some special classes of graphs. In this paper, we obtain the exact value of $\lambda_{k}(S(n,\ell))$ for $3\leq k\leq \ell^n$, and the exact value of $\kappa_{k}(S(n,\ell))$ for $3\leq k\leq \ell$, where $S(n, \ell)$ is the Sierpi\'{n}ski graphs with order $\ell^n$. As a direct consequence, these graphs provide additional interesting examples when $\lambda_{k}(S(n,\ell))=\kappa_{k}(S(n,\ell))$. We also study the some network properties of Sierpi\'{n}ski graphs